Skip to content

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Mar 18, 2024

Fixes #19942

Based on #19960

@dwijnand I would have pushed onto the original PR if it had been on staging. Better to always push to staging, not your own repo.

@odersky odersky changed the title Eta breaks implicits question mark Make sure typeParams returns a stable result even in the presence of completions Mar 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dwijnand dwijnand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, will do. Thank you Martin!

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Mar 18, 2024

This typeParams not being stable looked very scary. Good that you discovered it!

@odersky odersky merged commit 5dc6860 into scala:main Mar 18, 2024
@odersky odersky deleted the eta-breaks-implicits-question-mark branch March 18, 2024 18:37
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.4.2 milestone Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression in 7mind/izumi for implicit search / typer

3 participants