Skip to content

Conversation

@prolativ
Copy link
Contributor

We're going to use a changed branch naming schema for backporting branches in backporting scripts to avoid problems with branch protection rules:
backport-lts-{pr_number} instead of lts-backport-{pr_number}.
When backporting PRs in a batch we only want to run the build for the last PR in a batch. We don't care about builds for particular branches

- 'gh-readonly-queue/**'
- 'release-**'
- 'lts-**'
- 'backport-**'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hamzaremmal actually, do we care about builds of branches other than main? Typically a branch has a corresponding PR and then running the CI for this PR should be enough, right?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depends. We do sometimes maintain feature branches (like we did cc-experiment)...

Copy link
Contributor

@Gedochao Gedochao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@prolativ prolativ merged commit cb56072 into lts-3.3 Nov 21, 2024
33 checks passed
@prolativ prolativ deleted the optimize-lts-ci branch November 21, 2024 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants