Skip to content

Backport "Survive inaccessible types when computing implicit scope" to LTS #22128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
Parent: [sync/backports]: Synchronize with scala/scala3-lts
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Backport "Survive inaccessible types when computing implicit scope" to LTS #22128

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

@WojciechMazur
Copy link
Contributor

Backports #21589 to the 3.3.5.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]

@WojciechMazur
Survive inaccessible types when computing implicit scope
e889472 
Also: Give a better error message later when encountering a missing type that
refers to a private member of a base class. The previous one was misleading since
it referred to a potentially missing class file, which is certainly not the case here.

Fixes #21543

[Cherry-picked 472555d][modified]
@WojciechMazur
Fix check files
0484e65 
[Cherry-picked cd9a7c5][modified]
Base automatically changed from backport-lts-3.3-21566 to lts-3.3 December 4, 2024 17:21
@WojciechMazur
Copy link
Contributor Author

No regressions detected in the community build up to backport-lts-3.3-21857.

Reference

@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur merged commit 8fbd460 into lts-3.3 Dec 4, 2024
19 checks passed
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur deleted the backport-lts-3.3-21589 branch December 4, 2024 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@WojciechMazur