Skip to content

Conversation

@feeblefakie
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated backport of the following:

Please merge this PR after all checks have passed.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @feeblefakie, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request backports a critical fix for the CSV export functionality, specifically addressing an issue where the --no-header option was not being honored. The changes ensure that when users request to omit the header row from CSV exports, the system correctly processes this instruction. Additionally, new tests have been introduced to thoroughly verify this behavior, enhancing the robustness of the data export feature.

Highlights

  • Fix for CSV Export Header: The --no-header option for CSV exports now correctly prevents the header row from being written to the output file, resolving a previous bug where the header was always included.
  • Conditional Header Writing: The CsvExportManager has been updated to conditionally write the CSV header based on the isExcludeHeaderRow() option, ensuring proper adherence to the export settings.
  • New Unit Tests: Comprehensive unit tests have been added to CsvExportManagerTest to validate both scenarios: when the header is excluded and when it is included, ensuring the fix works as expected and preventing regressions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes an issue where the --no-header option was not being respected for CSV exports. The change in CsvExportManager adds the necessary conditional logic, and the new tests in CsvExportManagerTest properly validate both cases (with and without a header). I have one suggestion to improve the new test helper method by using temporary files, which will make the tests more robust and prevent potential flakiness from parallel execution.

@brfrn169 brfrn169 merged commit 4bfb4b0 into 3.16 Oct 17, 2025
56 checks passed
@brfrn169 brfrn169 deleted the 3.16-pull-2924 branch October 17, 2025 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants