Skip to content

Conversation

@ldecarvalho-doc
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc added type: new content New pages or categories status: tech review Waiting for technical review priority: high PRs that include documentation on breaking changes to products and features status: doc review Waiting for doc team review labels Mar 3, 2025
@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc self-assigned this Mar 3, 2025
ldecarvalho-doc and others added 2 commits March 4, 2025 11:08
Co-authored-by: Nathanael Demacon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rowena Jones <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Néda <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@crlptl crlptl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tremendous work!

@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc added the do not merge PR that shouldn't be merged before a specific date (eg release) label Mar 5, 2025
@Oursin
Copy link
Contributor

Oursin commented Mar 5, 2025

It could be useful to have a link to the String functions as we already have one to the Date/Time functions since we use some in the examples: https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/doc/langdef.md#string-functions

@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc removed the do not merge PR that shouldn't be merged before a specific date (eg release) label Mar 17, 2025
@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc merged commit 417dced into main Mar 17, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@ldecarvalho-doc ldecarvalho-doc deleted the MTA-5686 branch March 17, 2025 13:10
bene2k1 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: high PRs that include documentation on breaking changes to products and features status: doc review Waiting for doc team review status: tech review Waiting for technical review type: new content New pages or categories

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants