Skip to content

fix(inference): field validation is more complex than previously thought, relax it a bit #1710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix(inference): field validation is more complex than previously thought, relax it a bit #1710

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@scaleway-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@scaleway-bot scaleway-bot commented Jan 13, 2025

No description provided.

@scaleway-bot scaleway-bot requested a review from jremy42 as a code owner January 13, 2025 16:19
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 13, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 73560f4

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the tem Transactional Email issues, bugs and feature requests label Jan 13, 2025
@jremy42 jremy42 closed this Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jremy42 jremy42 Awaiting requested review from jremy42

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

tem Transactional Email issues, bugs and feature requests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@scaleway-bot @jremy42