(PTFE-2534) Remove sort and modify test assertion

[matthiasL-scality]

Purpose

• Remove wrong assert to be iso with other sort
• Add one .0 to test mixed_versions with 10.0

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.02%. Comparing base (12e203f) to head (a17b81d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #255      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.92%   89.02%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          75       75              
  Lines       10044    10053       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         8932     8950      +18     
+ Misses       1112     1103       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	87.47% <95.45%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
tests	87.44% <95.45%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
tests-BuildFailedTest	26.98% <4.54%> (?)
tests-QuickTest	34.11% <95.45%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
tests-RepositoryTests	26.64% <4.54%> (?)
tests-TaskQueueTests	51.95% <90.90%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
tests-TestBertE	66.12% <90.90%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
tests-TestQueueing	53.85% <90.90%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
tests-api-mock	16.15% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
tests-noqueue	77.84% <95.45%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
tests-noqueue-BuildFailedTest	26.98% <4.54%> (?)
tests-noqueue-QuickTest	34.11% <95.45%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
tests-noqueue-RepositoryTests	26.64% <4.54%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
tests-noqueue-TaskQueueTests	51.95% <90.90%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
tests-noqueue-TestBertE	62.50% <90.90%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
tests-noqueue-TestQueueing	26.66% <4.54%> (?)
tests-server	29.68% <3.84%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests	40.78% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
utests	24.66% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[tcarmet]

LGTM as it is, but it's hard for me to understand what exactly did you fix, or is it just an improvement? If you are fixing something you could add a higher level test case that did not pass before and would pass now that'd be helpful.

[charlesprost]

LGTM as it is, but it's hard for me to understand what exactly did you fix, or is it just an improvement? If you are fixing something you could add a higher level test case that did not pass before and would pass now that'd be helpful.

It was an extra test to make sure we cover an hybrid case and a rework of what we fixed in emergency mode last time

[tcarmet]

LGTM as it is, but it's hard for me to understand what exactly did you fix, or is it just an improvement? If you are fixing something you could add a higher level test case that did not pass before and would pass now that'd be helpful.

It was an extra test to make sure we cover an hybrid case and a rework of what we fixed in emergency mode last time

ok thanks for the extra context, then I think it's fine as it is 👍