Skip to content

Conversation

@larsoner
Copy link
Collaborator

Let's see if it works, it should rebuild and modify dist/index.js!

@larsoner larsoner changed the title ENH: Add automatic rebuild and automerge ENH: Add automatic rebuild May 20, 2025
@larsoner larsoner merged commit 94d2830 into scientific-python:master May 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@larsoner larsoner deleted the autofix branch May 20, 2025 15:21
larsoner added a commit to matthieutrs/circleci-artifacts-redirector-action that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
* upstream/master:
  Update NCC; pin fetch to v2 (scientific-python#71)
  ENH: Add automatic rebuild (scientific-python#72)
  Build(deps): Bump undici from 5.28.5 to 5.29.0
  Making config example and narrative consistent (scientific-python#67)
- run: ncc build index.js
env:
NODE_OPTIONS: "--openssl-legacy-provider"
- uses: autofix-ci/action@551dded8c6cc8a1054039c8bc0b8b48c51dfc6ef
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say we should pin the latest 1.3.1 hash as only the readme changed since then.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Their official docs suggest to use this hash, so maybe better to follow that?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think dependabot would pick up hash changes (without tag changes), so I would open a PR for their readme. (At least following the readme change history I didn't get the notion of them indeed suggesting to tag to individual hashes unassociated with any release)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh I didn't look at their readme just https://autofix.ci/ and https://autofix.ci/setup

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants