poc: make cat-blocks code configurable behind a flag #3411
+383
−23
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
KManolov3
changed the title
adzhindzhi
reviewed
Nov 5, 2025
| // The block has already been deleted. | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| // TODO: Can we skip the checks and always clear the timeouts? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking at clearTimeout() docs, we probably can, but I think it's better to leave it that way
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves
Part of spike related to https://scratchfoundation.atlassian.net/browse/UEPR-409
Proposed Changes
Import and (very) slightly adapt cat-blocks code from develop...618d673. Make it optional behind a flag.
Reason for Changes
This is a PoC to experiment with how hard it'd be to bring cat-blocks back as an optional theme