Skip to content

feature(jenkins): add cluster reuse support in Jenkins pipelines#14231

Draft
dimakr wants to merge 1 commit intoscylladb:masterfrom
dimakr:reuse_cluster_jenkins
Draft

feature(jenkins): add cluster reuse support in Jenkins pipelines#14231
dimakr wants to merge 1 commit intoscylladb:masterfrom
dimakr:reuse_cluster_jenkins

Conversation

@dimakr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dimakr dimakr commented Mar 27, 2026

Add reuse_cluster parameter to Jenkins pipelines. When set to an existing test ID, pipeline reuses the original SCT runner and skips provisioning.

Closes: SCT-138

Testing

  • [ ]

PR pre-checks (self review)

  • I added the relevant backport labels
  • I didn't leave commented-out/debugging code

Reminders

  • Add New configuration option and document them (in sdcm/sct_config.py)
  • Add unit tests to cover my changes (under unit-test/ folder)
  • Update the Readme/doc folder relevant to this change (if needed)

@dimakr dimakr self-assigned this Mar 27, 2026
@dimakr dimakr added the backport/none Backport is not required label Mar 27, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the P3 Medium Priority label Mar 27, 2026
@scylladb-promoter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

scylladb-promoter commented Mar 27, 2026

✅ Test Summary: PASSED

✅ Precommit: PASSED

Total Passed Failed Skipped
26 15 0 11

✅ Tests: PASSED

Total Passed Failed Errors Skipped
1712 1697 0 0 15

Full build log

@dimakr dimakr force-pushed the reuse_cluster_jenkins branch 9 times, most recently from 0ce612a to 129a295 Compare April 2, 2026 16:40
Add `reuse_cluster` parameter to Jenkins pipelines. When set to an existing
test ID, pipeline reuses the original SCT runner and skips provisioning.
@dimakr dimakr force-pushed the reuse_cluster_jenkins branch from 129a295 to 48e8c9a Compare April 2, 2026 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport/none Backport is not required P3 Medium Priority

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants