Skip to content

fix(artifacts): use proper parameter name for the provision type#14257

Merged
fruch merged 1 commit intoscylladb:masterfrom
vponomaryov:fix-provision-type-naming-in-pipelines
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

fix(artifacts): use proper parameter name for the provision type#14257
fruch merged 1 commit intoscylladb:masterfrom
vponomaryov:fix-provision-type-naming-in-pipelines

Conversation

@vponomaryov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vponomaryov vponomaryov commented Mar 30, 2026

Testing

  • [ ]

PR pre-checks (self review)

  • I added the relevant backport labels
  • I didn't leave commented-out/debugging code

Reminders

  • Add New configuration option and document them (in sdcm/sct_config.py)
  • Add unit tests to cover my changes (under unit-test/ folder)
  • Update the Readme/doc folder relevant to this change (if needed)

@scylladb-promoter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

✅ Test Summary: PASSED

✅ Precommit: PASSED

Total Passed Failed Skipped
24 14 0 10

✅ Tests: PASSED

Total Passed Failed Errors Skipped
1705 1690 0 0 15

Full build log

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fruch fruch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants