-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
Use the current user's SDKMAN installation #718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
reitzig
wants to merge
3
commits into
sdkman:master
Choose a base branch
from
reitzig:patch-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although I do see the point, the implementation does feel a bit hacky to me.
Can we assign this expression to a clearly named variable? Can we unset said variable at the end of the script? Can we collapse the two conditional blocks into one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, and of course, please refrain from using
awkas this forces a hard dependency that will often not be met on very basic systems.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which systems are that? The smallest I know comes with (an) awk:
Of course, BusyBox binaries are quite often not compatible with GNU ones... :/
That said, which dependencies are you comfortable with? For instance, I used to use the innocuous
statbut it turns out that macOS and Ubuntu come with incompatible versions (FreeBSD-ish vs GNU-ish).ls+awkwas the best I could come up with -- I'm open for suggestions!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
cutcommand is preferable as it is packaged as part of gnu coreutils. You could try something like this:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have a proposal? I felt it's a pretty straight-forward implementation for "do we point at this user's installation?". Of course, it will fail with system installations, but IIRC that's not a use-case you support?
Sure!
What do you mean?
[ -z ... ] || [ ... ]into[ ... ]? No, I don't think so;[ 1 -eq 1 || 1 -eq 2 ]doesn't parse.[[ 1 -eq 1 || 1 -eq 2 ]]would work, but you use single brackets everywhere else?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, yes I do think so. We use double square brackets throughout the sdkman codebase when dealing with complex expressions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does fail on the current Alpine (BusyBox v1.30.1). :/
Then, maybe
statwrapped away in a function and distinguish flavors there? That's incoreutils, after all.