Skip to content

Conversation

@xadupre
Copy link
Collaborator

@xadupre xadupre commented May 22, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.43902% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.64%. Comparing base (d1c3c07) to head (f6a1e0c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...torch_export_patches/patches/patch_transformers.py 12.50% 14 Missing ⚠️
onnx_diagnostic/helpers/graph_helper.py 93.16% 8 Missing ⚠️
...gnostic/torch_export_patches/onnx_export_errors.py 65.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
...nostic/torch_export_patches/patches/patch_torch.py 81.57% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #108      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.46%   74.64%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          87       88       +1     
  Lines        9077     9280     +203     
==========================================
+ Hits         6759     6927     +168     
- Misses       2318     2353      +35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sdpython sdpython changed the title better documentation Simple algorithm to render a simple onnx graph in ascii May 22, 2025
@sdpython sdpython changed the title Simple algorithm to render a simple onnx graph in ascii Simple algorithm to render a simple onnx graph in ascii, patch vmap May 22, 2025
@sdpython sdpython merged commit 770ef84 into main May 23, 2025
11 of 25 checks passed
@sdpython sdpython deleted the doc6 branch May 24, 2025 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants