Add multi table support to ResultsExplorer

[fealho]

CU-86b7ck0t5, Resolve #488

[sdv-team]

Task linked: CU-86b7ck0t5 SDGym - Add multi table support to ResultsExplorer #488

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.76923% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.98%. Comparing base (c13ed60) to head (3a78dba).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on feature_branch/mutli_table_benchmark.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
sdgym/datasets.py	82.35%	3 Missing ⚠️
sdgym/result_explorer/result_handler.py	87.50%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                           Coverage Diff                            @@
##           feature_branch/mutli_table_benchmark     #505      +/-   ##
========================================================================
+ Coverage                                 77.75%   77.98%   +0.23%     
========================================================================
  Files                                        30       30              
  Lines                                      2580     2621      +41     
========================================================================
+ Hits                                       2006     2044      +38     
- Misses                                      574      577       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	63.58% <52.30%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
unit	72.14% <89.23%> (+0.32%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[R-Palazzo]

Hi @fealho, coud you update this folder to match the new single_table/multi_table structure?
I think anything that is here can go into single_table.

To generate the multi-table examples, you could run benchmark_multi_table() with output_destination=/tests/integration/result_explorer/_benchmark_results so it creates the folder structure.

Then you can manually change the date to create multiple examples that you can test with some integration tests.

[R-Palazzo]

@fealho if you want to try out your changes for results saved on AWS you can use:
output_destination = 's3://sdgym-benchmark/Debug/'

I ran small single-table and multi-table benchmark with the new structure. You can see the folders here:

• single-table
• multi-table

[pvk-developer]

LGTM! Just remove the commented line

[R-Palazzo]

Looking good!

I just have a few questions but I tested it locally and on aws, it's working pretty well 👍

[R-Palazzo]

@fealho can you ask in the Team-Engineering channel which synthesizer we should use as the baseline for multi-table here?

Just to make sure everything is as expected. With this implementation it will be easy to update it in the future 👍

[R-Palazzo]

LGTM!

After fixing the tests it should be good to go