Skip to content

Conversation

@R-Palazzo
Copy link
Contributor

@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo commented Nov 14, 2025

Resolve #2672

@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo force-pushed the release_branch_CTGAN_0.11.1-Deepecho_0.7.1 branch from 5a11f18 to a5beb24 Compare November 14, 2025 18:21
@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo self-assigned this Nov 14, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.10%. Comparing base (1644d86) to head (22c3906).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2740   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.10%   98.10%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        8027     8034    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits         7875     7882    +7     
  Misses        152      152           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 75.66% <81.81%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit 96.82% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo force-pushed the release_branch_CTGAN_0.11.1-Deepecho_0.7.1 branch from a5beb24 to 36e1acb Compare November 18, 2025 14:13
@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2025 14:14
@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2025 14:14
@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo removed the request for review from a team November 18, 2025 14:15
Copy link
Member

@fealho fealho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this change also need to be done for PAR?

@R-Palazzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does this change also need to be done for PAR?

@fealho no we decided not to update PAR in the end because we noticed a slowdown in its performance. There is more info here.

@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo requested a review from fealho November 19, 2025 16:53
@R-Palazzo R-Palazzo force-pushed the release_branch_CTGAN_0.11.1-Deepecho_0.7.1 branch from 94a3f10 to 22c3906 Compare November 21, 2025 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When using PyTorch, enable GPU usage for MacOS

4 participants