Skip to content

docs: include types in saga 2.15.76 entity list#241

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intoclaude/pull-and-continue-I9Lk9from
copilot/sub-pr-238-again
Closed

docs: include types in saga 2.15.76 entity list#241
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intoclaude/pull-and-continue-I9Lk9from
copilot/sub-pr-238-again

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Feb 10, 2026

Saga entry 2.15.76 documented E2E tests for entity detail pages but omitted "types" from the parenthetical list, despite e2e/type-detail.spec.ts being included in the original commit.

Changes:

  • Updated docs/saga-2-expansion.md line 513 to include "types" in the entity list

Before:

| 2.15.76 | Add E2E tests for entity detail pages (moves, abilities, items, locations, natures, trainers) | ...

After:

| 2.15.76 | Add E2E tests for entity detail pages (moves, abilities, types, items, locations, natures, trainers) | ...

Resolves feedback from #238.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Co-authored-by: seandonn-boston <38230468+seandonn-boston@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] WIP address feedback on E2E tests for entity detail pages docs: include types in saga 2.15.76 entity list Feb 10, 2026
@seandonn-boston
Copy link
Owner

@copilot Resolve all merge conflicts

Copy link
Author

Copilot AI commented Feb 10, 2026

@copilot Resolve all merge conflicts

The PR has no merge conflicts. GitHub shows mergeable: true and mergeable_state: clean. The branch is ready to merge.

@seandonn-boston
Copy link
Owner

@copilot Resolve all merge conflicts

Copy link
Author

Copilot AI commented Feb 11, 2026

@copilot Resolve all merge conflicts

No merge conflicts exist. The PR shows mergeable: true and mergeable_state: clean. The only change is adding "types" to line 513 in docs/saga-2-expansion.md. The branch is ready to merge.

@seandonn-boston seandonn-boston marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants