Add scenario elements

[argenos]

No description provided.

[minhnh]

Why don't you make a separate one just for open scenarios? It's relatively easy to migrate later you're done fleshing out the details. I don't think making the "generic" version is required or a priority now right? This is also why I have kept my concepts in a separate namespace.

A few comments:

• Why would there be both Agent and Robot?
• ConfigFile is probably not part of the "agent" metamodel or? "Configuration" is a concept going beyond any file system, so you probably would run into issue when configs are not passed by "files" but other means, e.g. ROS topics. I will likely have a HasConfiguration concept that can be used with agents, objects, workspaces as well.
• I'd move Mesh to simulation maybe? And I would also be more specific with which "mesh" you are talking about. I think you mean Polygon Mesh?
• Do you want to enforce every scenario with a run number? I think a more scalable identification scheme would be UUID or?
• I think Artefact as a concept is not very useful, as every model you create is an "artefact." Is there something specific that you have in mind?