Update workflows for build-resources v4#177
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewLet me proceed with the review based on the standard code review checklist. Code Review - PR AnalysisCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ No defects identified
Testing❌ Not Applicable
Note: These workflow changes should be tested through actual GitHub Actions execution, which will happen automatically when merged. Documentation✅ README update not needed
✅ API docs not applicable
✅ Inline comments appropriate
❌ CHANGELOG.md not updated
✅ Markdown formatting
Security✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation not applicable
✅ Proper error handling
✅No sensitive data in logs
✅ No license files
SummaryThis PR is a clean upgrade of GitHub Actions workflow dependencies from Critical Issues: NoneMajor Issues: NoneMinor Recommendations:
Approval Status: ✅ APPROVEDThis PR is ready to merge. The changes are consistent, well-organized, and improve the workflow configuration. The only optional improvement would be adding a CHANGELOG entry.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
SENZING_MEMBERS→MEMBERS, etc.).outputs.job-statuswith.resultpull-requestspermission towritein lint-repo.yamlSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v3/@v2build-resources references to@v4kernelsamto cspell dictionary