Skip to content

Conversation

@eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Mar 19, 2025

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran and removed lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran labels Mar 19, 2025
@seqan-actions
Copy link
Member

Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/sharg-parser/268

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.63%. Comparing base (aacfd2a) to head (db9a67e).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #268      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.76%   94.63%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1738     1733       -5     
  Branches       44       46       +2     
==========================================
- Hits         1647     1640       -7     
- Misses         91       93       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran and removed lint [INTERNAL] signals that clang-format ran labels Mar 19, 2025
@eseiler eseiler merged commit 77c657a into seqan:main Mar 19, 2025
36 checks passed
@eseiler eseiler deleted the fix/codechecker branch March 19, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants