Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion governance/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ To be recognized with **Contributor** status, a community member must demonstrat

### Nomination

A **Maintainer** requests the addition of a new **Contributor** in the private *Maintainers* channel in Zulip, listing the number of nontrival contributions by that person. A person may also request that a **Maintainer** nominates them and vouch for them. If no objections are raised within one week, the person is added to the **Contributors** team.
A **Maintainer** requests the addition of a new **Contributor** in the private *Maintainers* channel in Zulip, listing the number of nontrival contributions by that person. A person may also request that a **Maintainer** nominates them and vouch for them. If no objections are raised within one week, the person is added to the **Contributors** team. Additionally, if four other maintainers express support before the week has elapsed then there is no need to wait out the remaining time.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have discussed about this in the TSC call today, it seems it'd be nice to add a minimum of 1 or 2 days of waiting time before we can make someone a contributor, in case someone has any concern to raise. Otherwise a new contributor could be approved in a few hours, without allowing any chance for someone to say anything about that person.

Would you be fine adding something like that to the new proposed text?


### Removal

Expand Down