Skip to content

Conversation

jeromekelleher
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #328

Copy link
Contributor

@benjeffery benjeffery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher force-pushed the all-missing-gts branch 2 times, most recently from 506ff64 to b0c4aba Compare March 10, 2025 11:59
@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Mar 10, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 98.811%. remained the same
when pulling b0c4aba on jeromekelleher:all-missing-gts
into 5341735 on sgkit-dev:main.

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher merged commit bcd0f74 into sgkit-dev:main Mar 10, 2025
30 checks passed
@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher deleted the all-missing-gts branch March 10, 2025 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Processing records with GT unset.
3 participants