Skip to content

Conversation

jeromekelleher
Copy link
Contributor

See #334

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Mar 19, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 98.816% (+0.005%) from 98.811%
when pulling f22234f on jeromekelleher:merge-header-contigs
into 8f7c672 on sgkit-dev:main.

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher force-pushed the merge-header-contigs branch 3 times, most recently from c2ef14a to 744da80 Compare March 19, 2025 11:35
@jeromekelleher
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is ready for review. The merge logic is fairly simple and hopefully obvious. Trying not to overthink the cases where we might fail or not fail on different contig definitions, and just doing a hard equality check. If this is a problem someone will report it.

Copy link
Contributor

@benjeffery benjeffery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - agree on hard equality

Changelog?

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher merged commit 1f9274b into sgkit-dev:main Mar 20, 2025
16 checks passed
@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher deleted the merge-header-contigs branch March 20, 2025 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants