Skip to content

Conversation

tomwhite
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #98

I haven't included tests that run on zarr-python v3, as that requires sgkit-dev/bio2zarr#288 which isn't ready yet. But I managed to run the tests locally under v3 with that change, and they all passed.

This is compatible with zarr-python v2, so it could be merged soon (before the bio2zarr change is done). (But no rush as #105 needs sorting out first.)

@tomwhite tomwhite force-pushed the zarr-python-v3-compatibility branch from db0af0c to 9a78fbf Compare November 29, 2024 10:55
Copy link
Contributor

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, all very uncontroversial!

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher merged commit e596e9a into sgkit-dev:main Nov 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@tomwhite
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, all very uncontroversial!

Yes - I think I may do the uncontroversial changes for bio2zarr separately too, as doing the whole thing in one go is proving tricky...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants