-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflict #191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Removed `require 'bundler/gem_tasks'` from Rakefile because it creates a conflicting `release` task that shadows our custom release task in rakelib/release.rake. Added manual :build task to replace what bundler/gem_tasks provided. This matches the react_on_rails pattern where rakelib/release.rake provides the release task without conflicts. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Warning Rate limit exceeded@justin808 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (45)
WalkthroughAdds a custom build task to package the gem and updates the default Rake task to run specs and build. Removes Bundler gem_tasks. Enhances release task with preflight git-clean check, dry-run support, optional version bump, and adjusted release flow including rebase pull and conditional gem release. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Dev
participant Rake as Rakefile
participant Gem as gem CLI
participant FS as Filesystem
Dev->>Rake: rake build
Rake->>Rake: require version
Rake->>Gem: gem build <gemspec>
Gem-->>Rake: built .gem file
Rake->>FS: ensure pkg/ exists
Rake->>FS: move <name>-<version>.gem -> pkg/
Note over Rake,FS: Default task runs spec then build
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Dev
participant Release as release.rake
participant Git as git
participant Gem as gem CLI
Dev->>Release: rake release[version?,dry_run?]
Release->>Git: git status --porcelain
Git-->>Release: pending changes?
alt Uncommitted changes
Release-->>Dev: abort (raise)
else Clean
Release->>Git: git pull --rebase
opt Version provided
Release->>Gem: gem bump --version <ver>
end
alt Dry run
Release-->>Dev: print planned steps (no publish)
else Real release
Release->>Gem: gem release
Release-->>Dev: success message + OTP note
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Review: Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflictSummaryThis PR successfully addresses a real issue where bundler/gem_tasks was creating a duplicate release task that conflicted with the custom release workflow in rakelib/release.rake. The solution is clean and follows the established pattern used in react_on_rails. Code Quality and Best PracticesStrengths:
Suggestions:
Potential Issues
Performance ConsiderationsNo significant performance concerns. The changes are minimal and only affect rake task execution, which is already a relatively slow operation. The custom :build task should perform similarly to the bundler version. Security ConcernsLow risk overall, but worth noting:
Test CoverageMissing test coverage:
Recommendations:
Approval RecommendationApprove with minor revisions. The core change is solid and solves the immediate problem. However, I recommend addressing these items before or shortly after merging: Before merging:
Follow-up improvements (can be separate PR): Additional Notes
Great work on identifying and fixing this task conflict! |
Cleaned up release.rake to exactly match react_on_rails pattern but without the npm/release-it parts that aren't needed for cypress-on-rails. Removed from react_on_rails version: - npm_version conversion logic - release-it command execution - Gemfile.lock updates for dummy apps - gemspec cleanup for subdirectories - GitHub packages publishing Kept from react_on_rails version: - Same structure and flow - RaisingMessageHandler class - TaskHelpers include pattern - git pull --rebase - gem bump with -v flag (fixed from --version) - gem release to rubygems.org - Post-release CHANGELOG reminder 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Code Review for PR #191: Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflict✅ Strengths
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
rakelib/release.rake (1)
37-47
: Prevent dry runs from mutating the repository.
gem bump
modifieslib/cypress_on_rails/version.rb
, so a dry run currently rewrites the version file even though no release happens. That leaves local changes behind and defeats the purpose of a dry run. Guard the bump (or invoke it with a dry-run option) so we only mutate the repo when we’re performing an actual release.- sh_in_dir(gem_root, "gem bump --no-commit #{gem_version.strip.empty? ? '' : %(-v #{gem_version})}") + unless is_dry_run + sh_in_dir(gem_root, "gem bump --no-commit #{gem_version.strip.empty? ? '' : %(-v #{gem_version})}") + else + puts "Skipping gem bump during dry run" + end
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Rakefile
(1 hunks)rakelib/release.rake
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
- GitHub Check: rails_6_1
- GitHub Check: rails_8
- GitHub Check: rails_7_2
Rakefile
Outdated
desc "Build gem into pkg directory" | ||
task :build do | ||
require_relative 'lib/cypress_on_rails/version' | ||
sh "gem build cypress-on-rails.gemspec" | ||
sh "mkdir -p pkg" | ||
sh "mv cypress-on-rails-#{CypressOnRails::VERSION}.gem pkg/" | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make the build task cross-platform.
mkdir -p
and mv
are Unix-specific; rake build
will fail on Windows where Bundler’s original tasks used Ruby helpers. Please switch to FileUtils
to keep the task portable.
-require 'rspec/core/rake_task'
+require 'rspec/core/rake_task'
+require 'fileutils'
@@
task :build do
require_relative 'lib/cypress_on_rails/version'
sh "gem build cypress-on-rails.gemspec"
- sh "mkdir -p pkg"
- sh "mv cypress-on-rails-#{CypressOnRails::VERSION}.gem pkg/"
+ FileUtils.mkdir_p("pkg")
+ FileUtils.mv("cypress-on-rails-#{CypressOnRails::VERSION}.gem", "pkg/", force: true)
end
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Rakefile around lines 8 to 14, the build task uses Unix-only shell commands
(`mkdir -p` and `mv`) which fail on Windows; replace these with Ruby FileUtils
calls: require 'fileutils' at top (or inside the task), use FileUtils.mkdir_p to
create the pkg directory and FileUtils.mv to move the built gem into pkg,
keeping the sh "gem build ..." call as-is; this makes the task cross-platform
and preserves existing behavior.
PR Review: Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflictOverall AssessmentThis is a well-thought-out PR that properly addresses a real conflict in the Rake task setup. The changes are clean, focused, and include good documentation. Code Quality & Best PracticesStrengths:
Suggestions:
Potential IssuesMedium Priority:
Performance ConsiderationsNo performance concerns. The changes are all build/release-time operations, not runtime code. Security ConcernsLow Priority:
Test CoverageGaps Identified: The PR description includes a test plan, but:
Recommendations:
Additional Notes
RecommendationApprove with minor changes:
The core changes are solid and solve the stated problem effectively. Nice work! |
The build task was not needed: - gem release command handles building the gem - We don't need a separate build step - The default task can just run specs This makes the Rakefile cleaner and simpler.
Set up automated linting and code quality tools: 1. Added RuboCop with extensions: - rubocop-rake for rake task linting - rubocop-rspec for RSpec linting - Created .rubocop.yml with sensible defaults 2. Created rake tasks for linting: - rake lint - Run all linters - rake lint:fix - Auto-fix issues - rake check_newlines - Verify files end with newlines - rake fix_newlines - Fix missing newlines 3. Added pre-commit hook installer (bin/install-hooks): - Checks for missing newlines - Runs RuboCop on staged Ruby files - Prevents commits with linting issues 4. Fixed existing issues: - Added newlines to 13 files missing them - Fixed RuboCop style violations - Added frozen string literal comments 5. Updated CI workflow: - Changed default task to run :ci (specs, lint, newlines) - Ensures all checks pass before merge To install pre-commit hook: ./bin/install-hooks 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Runs on all PRs and pushes to master: - RuboCop linting - Newline checks Ensures code quality standards are enforced in CI.
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR successfully addresses the duplicate release task issue and introduces comprehensive code quality improvements through RuboCop integration and automated linting. ✅ Strengths1. Core Issue Resolution
2. Code Quality Improvements
3. Developer Experience
4. Test Coverage
🔍 Observations & Minor Concerns1. Missing Build Task (Priority: Medium)The Rakefile removes task default: %w[spec build] The new version has: task default: :ci Question: Where is the Recommendation: Verify that 2. Pre-commit Hook Installation (Priority: Low)The Recommendation:
3. RuboCop Target Version (Priority: Low)
Recommendation: Consider adding Ruby version requirement to gemspec: s.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.6.0' 4. Frozen String Literal Consistency (Priority: Low)Most files now have Recommendation: Consider if generator templates should also use frozen string literals for consistency. 5. CI Task Name (Priority: Very Low)The new Rakefile has: desc 'Run all CI checks (specs, linting, newlines)'
task ci: %i[spec lint check_newlines] This is good, but 🔒 Security Review✅ No security concerns identified
⚡ Performance Considerations✅ Minor positive impact
📋 Testing & Validation ChecklistBased on the PR's test plan, verify:
💡 RecommendationsHigh Priority
Medium Priority
Low Priority
🎯 ConclusionThis is a well-executed PR that solves the stated problem and significantly improves code quality. The changes are primarily cosmetic formatting improvements with one critical functional fix (removing bundler/gem_tasks). Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor verification
The code quality is excellent, the approach is sound, and the automated tooling will help maintain consistency going forward. Review generated with attention to code quality, security, performance, and maintainability 🤖 |
- Added newlines to .rubocop.yml and .github/workflows/lint.yml - Expanded file types checked for newlines: - Added: .ru, .erb, .js, .json files - Excludes: pkg/, tmp/, coverage/ directories - Ensures all configuration and code files end properly This prevents parsing issues and maintains consistency across all file types.
PR Review - Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflictSummaryThis PR successfully addresses the duplicate ✅ Strengths1. Core Problem Resolution
2. Code Quality Improvements
3. Developer Experience
🔍 Areas for Consideration1. Missing Build Task ImplementationLocation: The Rakefile references a Recommendation: Verify that the build task is properly implemented. Expected implementation: desc 'Build the gem'
task :build do
sh 'gem build cypress-on-rails.gemspec'
FileUtils.mkdir_p 'pkg'
FileUtils.mv Dir.glob('cypress-on-rails-*.gem'), 'pkg/'
end 2. Gemspec: Missing Frozen String LiteralLocation: The gemspec file is missing the frozen string literal comment that RuboCop enforces (except in specs). While gemspec files could be excluded, they currently aren't. Recommendation: Either add 3. RuboCop Configuration: Ruby Version TargetLocation: TargetRubyVersion: 2.6 Ruby 2.6 reached end-of-life in March 2022. Consider if this is intentional for backward compatibility or should be updated. Recommendation: Document the minimum supported Ruby version in the README if 2.6 support is intentional, or bump to a supported version (2.7+ or preferably 3.x). 4. Pre-commit Hook ConcernsLocation: The pre-commit hook runs RuboCop on all staged files, which could be slow in large changesets. Suggestions:
5. Lint Workflow Missing NewlineLocation: The new lint.yml workflow file itself is missing a final newline, which would fail the Impact: This is caught by the CI checks added in this PR, which is actually good validation! 6. Test Coverage for New TasksThe new rake tasks ( 7. Release Task - Git Status CheckLocation: The clean working tree check is good, but it happens after a Recommendation: Consider checking for clean working tree after the rebase as well, or document that users should be on a clean branch before running release. 🔒 Security✅ No security concerns identified. The changes are focused on build tooling and code quality. 🧪 Test CoverageObservations:
Recommendation: After merging, actually test the release workflow in a dry-run mode: rake release[1.19.0,true] 🚀 Performance✅ No performance concerns. The linting additions run in CI and optionally in pre-commit hooks, not in production code. 📝 DocumentationGood:
Could improve:
Final RecommendationsBefore Merging:
After Merging:
Overall AssessmentCode Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent This is a solid PR that not only fixes the release task conflict but also significantly improves code quality and developer experience through automated linting. The concerns raised are minor and mostly about consistency and documentation. Great work! 🎉 Generated by Claude Code PR Review |
PR Review: Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflictSummaryThis PR successfully addresses the release task conflict and introduces significant code quality improvements through RuboCop integration and consistent formatting. The changes are well-structured and align with Ruby best practices. ✅ Strengths1. Clear Problem Resolution
2. Code Quality Improvements
3. Developer Experience
4. Refactoring Quality
|
PR Review: Remove bundler/gem_tasks to fix release task conflictOverviewThis PR successfully addresses the duplicate release task issue by removing ✅ Strengths1. Core Problem Resolution
2. Code Quality Infrastructure
3. Code Quality Improvements
4. Gemspec Improvements
|
Summary
Fixes the release task conflict by removing
bundler/gem_tasks
which was creating a duplicaterelease
task.Problem
The Rakefile had
require 'bundler/gem_tasks'
which provides a built-inrelease
task. This conflicted with our customrelease
task inrakelib/release.rake
, causing:Solution
require 'bundler/gem_tasks'
from Rakefile:build
task to replace what bundler/gem_tasks providedrelease
task exists (in rakelib/release.rake)This matches the react_on_rails pattern where rakelib/release.rake provides the release workflow.
Release Workflow
Test Plan
rake -T release
shows only one release taskrake release[1.19.0]
correctly updates versionrake build
still works🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores