Skip to content

Mark app container ready after initial render#79

Merged
shayancoin merged 3 commits intomainfrom
codex/update-layout-to-wrap-children-and-add-effect
Oct 16, 2025
Merged

Mark app container ready after initial render#79
shayancoin merged 3 commits intomainfrom
codex/update-layout-to-wrap-children-and-add-effect

Conversation

@shayancoin
Copy link
Owner

@shayancoin shayancoin commented Oct 16, 2025

Summary

  • wrap the app layout in a root container marked with a data-ready attribute
  • add a client-side effect that flips the flag to true after the header and hero render

Testing

  • npm run lint

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68f12bec1ca0833097eeed4b15d11abe

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduces an app readiness mechanism that marks the interface as ready once initial rendering completes, improving the reliability of UI-ready state and timing for interactive elements.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Adds a client-side React component that, after mount, uses a double requestAnimationFrame to set data-ready="true" on the DOM element with id app; layout now wraps children in an id="app" container and mounts the effect to control that attribute.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New AppReadyEffect component
frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx
Adds a default-exported client-side React component that on mount finds #app, schedules two requestAnimationFrame calls, sets data-ready="true", and on unmount cancels frames and resets data-ready="false". Renders null.
Root layout integration
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
Wraps existing children inside <div id="app" data-ready="false">...</div> and mounts <AppReadyEffect /> inside that wrapper; imports the new component.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Root as RootLayout
    participant Effect as AppReadyEffect
    participant DOM as #app (DOM)

    Root->>DOM: render <div id="app" data-ready="false">children + <AppReadyEffect/>
    Note over Effect,DOM: on mount
    Effect->>DOM: requestAnimationFrame (frame A)
    Note right of Effect: schedules second rAF inside first
    Effect->>DOM: requestAnimationFrame (frame B) (inside A)
    Effect->>DOM: setAttribute data-ready="true" (on B)
    Note over Effect,DOM: on unmount
    Effect-->>DOM: cancel pending rAF(s) and setAttribute data-ready="false"
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped into the root with care,
Two little frames to wake the air,
"Ready" I set with a gentle tap,
Then tidy up when I unwrap,
The app blinks bright — a sprightly hare!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The description does not follow the repository’s required template headings and is missing the “PR Type,” “Short Description,” and “Tests Added” sections, making it incomplete against the defined structure. Update the pull request description to include the “PR Type,” “Short Description,” and “Tests Added” sections exactly as outlined in the template, and ensure the headings match the template format.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly describes the primary change of toggling the app container’s readiness state after the initial render, matching the core functionality introduced in the changeset. It is clear, concise, and directly reflects the main update without extraneous details.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Docstrings were successfully generated.
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/update-layout-to-wrap-children-and-add-effect

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 24 to 29
<Providers>
{children}
<div id="app" data-ready="false">
{children}
<AppReadyEffect />
</div>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep data-ready attribute in sync across re-renders

The wrapper sets data-ready="false" in JSX while AppReadyEffect flips it to true only once inside a useEffect([]). When Providers re-renders (for example on any client-side navigation or provider state change), React will reapply this JSX and set the attribute back to false, but the effect will not run again to mark it ready. Any CSS or scripts that rely on data-ready will see the app stuck in a non-ready state after the first navigation. Consider deriving the attribute from React state or rerunning the effect on updates so the flag remains accurate.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2a35c4 and 9229c75.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx (1)
  • AppReadyEffect (13-34)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2)

28-28: AppReadyEffect placement is correct.

Placing <AppReadyEffect /> after {children} ensures the effect hook runs after the children are rendered and mounted. This guarantees that the data-ready attribute flip happens only after the initial content is in the DOM, which aligns with the PR objective.


26-29: Verify the new wrapper doesn't break existing CSS or duplicate IDs.

The new div#app wrapper changes the DOM structure. Ensure that:

  1. No other element uses id="app" (which would cause duplicate IDs)
  2. No CSS selectors depend on the previous DOM structure (e.g., direct child selectors targeting Providers > *)

Run the following script to check for potential conflicts:

Comment on lines 13 to 34
export default function AppReadyEffect() {
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')

if (!appRoot) {
return
}

let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})

return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
}, [])

return null
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Consider simplifying to single requestAnimationFrame.

The double requestAnimationFrame pattern defers execution until after the next browser paint. While this ensures all DOM updates are complete, a single requestAnimationFrame is typically sufficient for marking an element as ready after render. The double-rAF pattern is more commonly used when you need to read layout properties that must reflect applied CSS changes.

If you confirm that single rAF is sufficient, apply this diff:

-    let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
-      frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
-        markReady(appRoot)
-      })
+    let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
+      markReady(appRoot)
     })

However, if you need to guarantee that all layout effects and paints have completed before marking ready (e.g., for third-party tools or analytics), the double-rAF is appropriate and can remain as-is.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export default function AppReadyEffect() {
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')
if (!appRoot) {
return
}
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})
return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
}, [])
return null
}
export default function AppReadyEffect() {
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')
if (!appRoot) {
return
}
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
}, [])
return null
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx around lines 13 to 34 the
component uses a double requestAnimationFrame to defer markReady, which can be
simplified: replace the nested requestAnimationFrame calls with a single
requestAnimationFrame that calls markReady(appRoot), store that frame id in the
same variable, and keep the existing cleanup to cancelAnimationFrame(frame) and
call resetReady(appRoot); ensure you still bail out if appRoot is missing and
that frame is defined before canceling.

Comment on lines +21 to +30
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})

return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix frame cancellation to handle nested requestAnimationFrame.

The current cleanup logic has a subtle race condition. When frame is reassigned on line 22, the outer requestAnimationFrame ID is lost. If the component unmounts between the first and second frame callback, only the second frame will be canceled, leaving the first callback to execute and potentially call markReady on an unmounted component.

Apply this diff to track both frame IDs separately:

-    let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
-      frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
+    let frame1: number | undefined
+    let frame2: number | undefined
+    
+    frame1 = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
+      frame2 = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
         markReady(appRoot)
       })
     })
 
     return () => {
-      cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
+      if (frame1 !== undefined) cancelAnimationFrame(frame1)
+      if (frame2 !== undefined) cancelAnimationFrame(frame2)
       resetReady(appRoot)
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})
return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
let frame1: number | undefined
let frame2: number | undefined
frame1 = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame2 = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})
return () => {
if (frame1 !== undefined) cancelAnimationFrame(frame1)
if (frame2 !== undefined) cancelAnimationFrame(frame2)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx around lines 21 to 30, the
cleanup cancels only the last requestAnimationFrame ID because the outer frame
ID is overwritten; store the outer and inner frame IDs in separate variables
(e.g., outerFrame and innerFrame), assign outerFrame from the first
requestAnimationFrame and innerFrame from the nested one, and in the return
cleanup cancel both cancelAnimationFrame(outerFrame) and
cancelAnimationFrame(innerFrame) and still call resetReady(appRoot).

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx (1)

21-30: Reminder: Frame cancellation issue remains unresolved.

The frame ID reassignment issue flagged in previous reviews still exists. When frame is reassigned on line 22, the outer requestAnimationFrame ID is lost, creating a race condition if the component unmounts between callbacks.

Refer to the previous review comment for the suggested fix using separate variables for both frame IDs.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9229c75 and 364cccf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +14 to +31
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')

if (!appRoot) {
return
}

let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})

return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Critical: Add empty dependency array to run effect only on mount.

The useEffect lacks a dependency array, causing it to execute after every render. This creates performance issues and unnecessary DOM manipulations, as new requestAnimationFrame callbacks are scheduled on each render cycle.

According to the PR objectives ("after the header and hero render"), the effect should run once on mount.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-  useEffect(() => {
+  useEffect(() => {
     const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')
 
     if (!appRoot) {
       return
     }
 
     let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
       frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
         markReady(appRoot)
       })
     })
 
     return () => {
       cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
       resetReady(appRoot)
     }
-  })
+  }, [])
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')
if (!appRoot) {
return
}
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})
return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
})
useEffect(() => {
const appRoot = document.getElementById('app')
if (!appRoot) {
return
}
let frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
frame = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
markReady(appRoot)
})
})
return () => {
cancelAnimationFrame(frame)
resetReady(appRoot)
}
}, [])
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx around lines 14 to 31, the
useEffect has no dependency array and therefore runs on every render; change the
hook to run only once on mount by adding an empty dependency array as the second
argument to useEffect (useEffect(() => { ... }, [])); keep the existing
requestAnimationFrame scheduling and the cleanup that cancels the frame and
calls resetReady(appRoot); if your linter complains, add an inline
eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps comment above the effect or
explicitly include any stable values needed.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Note

Docstrings generation - SUCCESS
Generated docstrings for this pull request at #135

coderabbitai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
…ect`

Docstrings generation was requested by @shayancoin.

* #79 (comment)

The following files were modified:

* `frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx`
* `frontend/src/app/layout.tsx`
@shayancoin shayancoin merged commit 26b41f1 into main Oct 16, 2025
0 of 5 checks passed
shayancoin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2025
…ect` (#135)

Docstrings generation was requested by @shayancoin.

* #79 (comment)

The following files were modified:

* `frontend/src/app/components/app-ready-effect.tsx`
* `frontend/src/app/layout.tsx`

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant