-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Select multiple objects #81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
For what it's worth, ShadowTheAge@651c079 was merged in ShadowTheAge#155, so it shouldn't be re-done here. I'm not sure why it shows up in ShadowTheAge#168. |
|
@DaleStan nice to see you here :) Hopefully you are not bothered by me re-applying your PR for YAFC-CE? I really like it, and am missing it a lot! I didn't check if that commit was applied already, I just noticed it didn't belong to the PR. Maybe due to the merges that we done in the PR, GitHub got confused and showed it in the PR? Edit The PR was squash merged, so git doesn't know these separate commits (that I skipped) are the same. A rebase of the original PR would remove them from the PR. |
|
No, no problem at all. I've been away from Factorio and didn't even realize this fork existed until you tagged me. We do need to include the |
9433994 to
194793e
Compare
|
@veger, this PR is not a draft, so I wanted to check with you if it's ready for a review. |
|
Yes it is ready for review. @DaleStan created to PR in the original YAFC project, I just moved it and rebased it on the YAFC-CE codebase. |
661be3d to
9640566
Compare
|
Edit Now I remember: I had to manually apply all the changes due to the big differences after changing the code style.
|
…, and allow selection of multiple objects by ctrl-clicking.
…display that item.
9640566 to
e64c310
Compare
|
done |
shpaass
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionality seems fine. Code-wise, I won't claim that I understood everything, but I saw nothing too out-of-place.
Another PR by @DaleStan (ShadowTheAge#168) which I use quite often.
I had to fully rebase it due to all the changes we made in YAFC-CE. I tested it a bit, and it seems to be working.
From the original PR:
Note that I split theIt is required!MessageBoxrefactoring (getting rid of singleton implementation) into a separate commit. If this change is not desired, we can easily get rid of it.The original PR contains 2 more commits, of which I didn't fully understand ShadowTheAge@651c079 but it seemed unrelated to this feature.