Skip to content

Feat/add new data model for schematics#1466

Open
mistrykaran91 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-new-data-model-for-schematics
Open

Feat/add new data model for schematics#1466
mistrykaran91 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/add-new-data-model-for-schematics

Conversation

@mistrykaran91
Copy link
Member

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why. Add relevant
screenshots and reference related issues via Closes #XY or Related to #XY.


@mistrykaran91 mistrykaran91 force-pushed the feat/add-new-data-model-for-schematics branch from 1a7a82f to 0a5efa3 Compare February 6, 2026 09:55
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly enhances the schematics migration capabilities by introducing a new data model and logic for pattern-based replacements, splitting input properties, and adding default attributes when renaming elements. The changes are extensive, well-structured, and include comprehensive tests for the new functionality. Overall, this is a great addition. I've identified one potential bug in the new pattern replacement logic and a minor maintainability improvement, which are detailed in the comments.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@mistrykaran91 mistrykaran91 force-pushed the feat/add-new-data-model-for-schematics branch from 0a5efa3 to 289813d Compare February 6, 2026 10:18
@mistrykaran91 mistrykaran91 force-pushed the feat/add-new-data-model-for-schematics branch from 289813d to 3c325b8 Compare February 6, 2026 10:23
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Code Coverage

@mistrykaran91 mistrykaran91 marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 11:22
@mistrykaran91 mistrykaran91 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2026 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant