-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
feat: add status to the ModelValidation CRs, tracking pod and modelva… #47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
knrc
wants to merge
1
commit into
sigstore:main
Choose a base branch
from
knrc:controller_status
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, instead of creating a custom hashing method for drift detection, it's best to use Kubernetes build-in fields. These are more robust and are the standard pattern for operators.
Use
.metadata.generation
and a status field likestatus.observedGeneration
or ObservedGeneration field within a Condition struct. The reconciliation loop should follow this logic:.metadata.generation
withstatus.observedGeneration
.status.observedGeneration
to equal.metadata.generation
.Using
.metadata.resourceVersion
is another option, butgeneration
is typically preferred for tracking spec-only changes, asresourceVersion
changes on every update, including status updates.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hashing is not just about detecting drift, it's also used for tracking within
PodInfo
so I know which specific configuration applied to the pods. I have no problem adding the observed generation in addition to the hash, as a quick sanity check, but not replacing the hash. I wouldn't want to use resourceVersion, as that comes frometcd
and represents every change to the resource.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@osmman I've updated the code to add the generation check, so we don't need to redo the hash if that hasn't changed. I also tidied up some older code, it was still tracking resourceVersion but I never used it.
Please take a look at the changes