-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Configure maven central publishing #1042
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Appu Goundan <[email protected]>
b2656a5
to
28171bb
Compare
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-java")) | ||
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-maven-plugin")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add gradle plugin artifacts as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is creating some issue where it's trying to apply the plugin on itself? We can try to add it in after, but for now, I'd like to get this in so we can publish these (and still publish the plugins to the portal)
An exception occurred applying plugin request [id: 'build-logic.java-published-library']
> Failed to apply plugin 'dev.sigstore.sign'.
> Plugin with id 'dev.sigstore.sign-base' not found.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are the changes and how do you reproduce the error of "Failed to apply plugin 'dev.sigstore.sign'"?
diff --git a/build.gradle.kts b/build.gradle.kts
index bb9cfe5..fa3933a 100644
--- a/build.gradle.kts
+++ b/build.gradle.kts
@@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ nmcpAggregation {
dependencies {
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-java"))
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-maven-plugin"))
+ nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-gradle:sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin"))
+ nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-gradle:sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin"))
}
% CENTRAL_PORTAL_USERNAME=u CENTRAL_PORTAL_PASSWORD=p ./gradlew publishAggregationToCentralPortal -m
:sigstore-java:cleanupDirectory SKIPPED
:sigstore-java:generateBuildInfo SKIPPED
:sigstore-java:protobufDummy SKIPPED
:sigstore-java:extractProto SKIPPED
:sigstore-java:processResources SKIPPED
...
[Incubating] Problems report is available at: file:////sigstore-java/build/reports/problems/problems-report.html
Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it incompatible with Gradle 9.0.
You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
For more on this, please refer to https://docs.gradle.org/8.14.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings in the Gradle documentation.
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hrmm interesting, maybe it doesn't add signing?
diff --git a/build.gradle.kts b/build.gradle.kts
index bb9cfe5..fa3933a 100644
--- a/build.gradle.kts
+++ b/build.gradle.kts
@@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ nmcpAggregation {
dependencies {
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-java"))
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-java"))
nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-maven-plugin"))
+ nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-gradle:sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin"))
+ nmcpAggregation(project(":sigstore-gradle:sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin"))
}
diff --git a/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin/build.gradle.kts b/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin/build.gradle.kts
index 8ef4908..0642901 100644
--- a/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin/build.gradle.kts
+++ b/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin/build.gradle.kts
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
plugins {
id("build-logic.kotlin-dsl-published-gradle-plugin")
+ id("build-logic.java-published-library")
id("build-logic.test-junit5")
}
diff --git a/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin/build.gradle.kts b/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin/build.gradle.kts
index 2b5133c..fe0322a 100644
--- a/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin/build.gradle.kts
+++ b/sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-plugin/build.gradle.kts
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
plugins {
id("build-logic.kotlin-dsl-published-gradle-plugin")
+ id("build-logic.java-published-library")
id("build-logic.test-junit5")
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that sigstore-gradle/sigstore-gradle-sign-base-plugin/build.gradle.kts
already has id("build-logic.kotlin-dsl-published-gradle-plugin")
which internally has id("build-logic.publish-to-central")
.
So the addition of id("build-logic.java-published-library")
should not be needed for sigstore-gradle/*/build.gradle.kts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
while signing, etc is all configured in java-published-library
Apparently, we'd better move signing to publish-to-central
or a separate file.
I might try signing the plugin itself.
However, I did use com.github.vlsi.state-vote-release
plugin to release com.github.vlsi.state-vote-release
, so the limitation of "plugin can't be used" sounds strange.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I think you brought that up when we discussed it last time. I can't remember the details I think it might be lost in slack history unfortunately. If you find a solution I would love to include it. I was just unable to find one that worked.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might try once again and add a code comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any update here? I would like to unblock this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, sorry, I did not intend to block the pr
should consume secrets from gcp during publishing. Note that this means we have moved our pgp key to something else and we must document that releases 2.x onwards use the new key.