refactor: enable linter rule QF1011 for 'Omit redundant types from declaration'

[mwbrooks]

Summary

This pull request enables the linter staticcheck rule QF1011: 'Omit redundant type from variable declaration'.

This is a very straight-forward linting rule that we've already been practicing. It just looks like a few redundant type declarations slipped through.

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks string 🧵

It's so interesting to me that these are all for filepath.Join! LGTM! I'm also interested in if another linting rule enforces the walrus assignment := over var but that's of course no blocker for this PR 🚢 💨

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.17%. Comparing base (6f92582) to head (60844b0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/iostreams/logfile.go	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
internal/pkg/auth/login.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #89      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.19%   63.17%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         210      210              
  Lines       22186    22186              
==========================================
- Hits        14020    14017       -3     
- Misses       7081     7083       +2     
- Partials     1085     1086       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mwbrooks]

It's so interesting to me that these are all for filepath.Join!

I was wondering that myself! Another example of copy & paste spreading the code around?

walrus assignment

😆 Love the name! I haven't noticed a rule, but I hope there is one!