feat(bolt-install): set manifest source to remote for non-rosi projects

[mwbrooks]

CHANGELOG

Experimental Feature: --experiment bolt-install

slack create and slack init now set manifest source to "app settings" (remote) for Bolt JS & Bolt Python projects. This means that Bolt Framework projects now treat the app settings as the source of truth. The manifest.json file is only used when creating a new app for the project.

• slack create --experiment bolt-install
• slack init --experiment bolt-install

Summary

This pull request updates slack create --experiment bolt-install and slack init --experiment bolt-install to set a different manifest source depending the runtime:

• Deno SDK: manifest.source: "local"
• Bolt Frameworks: manifest.source: "remote"

Previously, all runtimes used manifest.source: "local".

Reviewers

# No Experiment + Deno SDK (no changes)
$ lack create asdf -t slack-samples/deno-starter-template
# → Expect output: manifest source to "project" (local)
$ rm -rf asdf/

# No Experiment + Bolt Framework (no changes)
$ lack create asdf -t slack-samples/bolt-js-starter-template
# → Expect output: manifest source to "project" (local)
$ rm -rf asdf/

# With Experiment + Deno SDK
$ lack create asdf -t slack-samples/deno-starter-template --experiment bolt-install
# → Expect output: manifest source to "project" (local)
$ rm -rf asdf/

# ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆
# With Experiment + Bolt Framework
# ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆
$ lack create asdf -t slack-samples/bolt-js-starter-template --experiment bolt-install
# → Expect output: manifest source to "app settings" (remote)
$ rm -rf asdf/

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.31%. Comparing base (a2b6b3e) to head (ca4184e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #96   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.30%   63.31%           
=======================================
  Files         211      211           
  Lines       22276    22282    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        14101    14107    +6     
  Misses       7086     7086           
  Partials     1089     1089           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks Looks good to me! 🚢 💨

This is an exciting change for changes to follow and it's nice that this is behind the experiment for now!

[zimeg]

Nice! It's so nice to make this output explicit to avoid unexpected UI changes in perhaps later iteration 👾

[mwbrooks]

Yea, I agree. I remember when you suggested adding it and it's helping to catch changes. 🪤

[zimeg]

🔗 ✨

[mwbrooks]

Thanks for the super quick review @zimeg and helping to document experiments better @technically-tracy 🙇🏻 Looks like we're safe to merge this one