Skip to content

Conversation

@JohnChangUK
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

| -------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
| **Developer Control** | ✅ Full control via allowlists | ❌ Refs transferred to pool | ✅ Full control retained |
| **Multiple Protocols** | ✅ Via allowlist management | ❌ Single pool only | ✅ Via transfer ref sharing |
| **Supply Model** | 🔥 Burn/Mint (supply changes) | 🔥 Burn/Mint (supply changes) | 🔒 Lock/Release (supply constant) |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes LR look the best but given the potential need for liquidity management I'd argue it's by far the worst. Can we showcase the potential issue if you want to use LR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@RensR RensR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Text looks good, didn't run the commands, I assume devrel will do so

friedemannf
friedemannf previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants