-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
[CRE-491] Bump common and other deps #1576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ad77053 to
1110302
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR updates dependency versions, primarily bumping chainlink-common from v0.9.6-0.20260107095648-223976d2b9f1 to v0.9.6-0.20260114142648-bd9e1b483e96 across multiple modules, along with updates to Google genproto packages and other dependencies.
Changes:
- Updated
chainlink-commondependency to a newer version across all modules - Updated
google.golang.org/genprotopackages to newer versions - Upgraded Go version and various transitive dependencies in the Solana chain module
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| integration-tests/go.mod | Updated chainlink-common and Google genproto dependencies |
| go.mod | Updated chainlink-common dependency version |
| devenv/go.mod | Updated chainlink-common and Google genproto dependencies |
| chains/solana/go.mod | Updated Go version, chainlink-common, and multiple transitive dependencies |
| chains/solana/deployment/go.mod | Updated chainlink-common, Google genproto, and grpc dependencies |
| chains/evm/deployment/go.mod | Updated chainlink-common dependency version |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
5170d0d to
beae549
Compare
|
RensR
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@agusaldasoro probably want to look at those linter issues. Since the CI isn't required (should it be?) I'm OK to approve
No description provided.