Render extra CA certs as optional

[tobsyg]

• Tests written and linted ℹ︎
• Documentation written ℹ︎
• Commit history is tidy ℹ︎

What this does

Related to support case #

Rendering CA certs as optional

Notes for the reviewer

Attempt to run Snyk Kubernetes chart without specifying the extraCaCerts and certsConfigMap via values
The secret should then not be mounted into the Snyk pod prior to running 00115307

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[snyk-pr-review-bot]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Clarification Needed The PR description mentions "The secret should then not be mounted", but the code change at lines 287-292 makes a configMap volume optional. Please confirm if this is the intended resource type or if a secret is also involved and was missed. {{- if .Values.certsConfigMap }} - name: ssl-certs configMap: name: {{ .Values.certsConfigMap }} optional: true {{- end }}

[tobsyg]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Clarification Needed
The PR description mentions "The secret should then not be mounted", but the code change at lines 287-292 makes a configMap volume optional. Please confirm if this is the intended resource type or if a secret is also involved and was missed.

{{- if .Values.certsConfigMap }}
- name: ssl-certs
  configMap:
    name: {{ .Values.certsConfigMap }}
    optional: true
{{- end }}

I confirm this is a typo in the description, the actual resource type is a configMap