Skip to content

chore: update ci script #1614

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: update ci script #1614

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kateeselius
Copy link
Contributor

@kateeselius kateeselius commented Oct 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What this does

Adds additional labels to our configuration writing ci script to enable better logging

@kateeselius kateeselius requested a review from bgardiner October 17, 2025 14:08
@kateeselius kateeselius changed the title ci: update ci script chore: update ci script Oct 17, 2025
@kateeselius kateeselius marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2025 14:37
@kateeselius kateeselius requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2025 14:37
@snyk-pr-review-bot
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Hardcoded Labels

The new labels snykappname, snykdclstored, snykdclprocessed, and snykowner are hardcoded directly into the script. For consistency with other labels in this file that use variables (e.g., $SNYK_OWNER_LABEL_KEY), and for better long-term maintainability, consider defining these values as environment variables in the CI configuration.

 
snykappname: snyk-monitor
snykdclstored: 2-confidential
snykdclprocessed: 2-confidential
snykowner: container

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bgardiner bgardiner bgardiner approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kateeselius @bgardiner