-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
Sort tokens in CTLexerBuilder codegen for deterministic output #576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this environment variable always defined?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you can see it also used in the
ct_token_mapcodegen at the top of the diff context in the first patch in this series. 719da09I believe it is ensured by:
https://docs.rs/vergen/latest/vergen/struct.BuildBuilder.html#method.build_timestamp
https://github.com/softdevteam/grmtools/blob/master/lrlex/build.rs#L4
along with the compile time caching behavior of the
env!macro:https://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~cs146a/rust/doc-02-21-2015/std/macro.env!.html
So I think this is including a timestamp from the time when
lrlex/build.rsis built to everytoken_map.rs,so this addition syncs things so that applies to the main lex output as well!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, yes, I can see. @ratmice I think you're best placed to judge this PR.