SIMD-0452: Charge CUs for ABIv0/v1 Instructions#452
SIMD-0452: Charge CUs for ABIv0/v1 Instructions#452Lichtso wants to merge 1 commit intosolana-foundation:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Hello Lichtso! Welcome to the SIMD process. By opening this PR you are affirming that your SIMD has been thoroughly discussed and vetted in the SIMD discussion section. The SIMD PR section should only be used to submit a final technical specification for review. If your design / idea still needs discussion, please close this PR and create a new discussion here. This PR requires the following approvals before it can be merged:
Once all requirements are met, you can merge this PR by commenting |
Lichtso
force-pushed
the
charge-cus-for-abi-v0-and-v1-instructions
branch
from
a22e932 to
dd7de8d
Compare
Lichtso
changed the title
| It will break existing TX building as the CUs required will be significantly | ||
| increased. To counter this we either have to offer an alternative (ABIv2) or | ||
| adjust the CU price / fees and block packing limits. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We definitely need to do something like this. However, we should combine this with @igor56D's work on the cost model into a single change, so that we don't keep breaking devs. We should do a big change, make certain usage patterns significantly more expensive, have proper comms around this, and do this once.
|
Conceptually, fixing usage-based pricing makes total sense and is a good idea. Practically speaking, if the goal is to fix CPI via direct mapping, it makes no sense to try and solve for distorted computational economics of behavior that we explicitly plan to remove. If we’re going to ship DM, we should do that first, eliminate the entire nested CPI cost section and reevaluate our cost model. |
3 participants
No description provided.