Clarify that SIMD-0392 balance checking semantics apply to fee/commission distribution

[igor56D]

Fee/Commission distribution is subject to RentState transition checks just like write-locked accounts are so the same semantics need to be enforced there.

[simd-bot]

Hello igor56D! Welcome to the SIMD process. By opening this PR you are affirming that your SIMD has been thoroughly discussed and vetted in the SIMD discussion section. The SIMD PR section should only be used to submit a final technical specification for review. If your design / idea still needs discussion, please close this PR and create a new discussion here.

This PR requires the following approvals before it can be merged:

• At least one approval from a Anza team member: t-nelson, sakridge, or bw-solana
• At least one approval from an Firedancer team member: ptaffet-jump, topointon-jump, 0x0ece, lidatong, or ripatel-fd

Once all requirements are met, you can merge this PR by commenting /merge.

[buffalojoec]

Looks good, but can you update it to say "commission" instead of "fee"? That way, it covers the existing fee-based distribution as well as the upcoming commission-based block revenue distribution.
anza-xyz/agave#9380 (review)

You can maybe add a tiny paragraph that mentions this applies to the current fee distribution as well as the next version of commission distribution where fees are distributed via block revenue commission (SIMD-0123).

[buffalojoec]

Lgtm, thanks for adding!

[igor56D]

Can I get approvals on this @bw-solana @topointon-jump? very small change

[simd-bot]

Thanks, bw-solana!

⚠️ Status: Cannot merge yet

• Missing approval from: Firedancer (ptaffet-jump, topointon-jump, 0x0ece, lidatong, or ripatel-fd)