Skip to content

[v4.6] feat(CI): Use rspec-github formatter #6356

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
tvdeyen merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2025
Merged

[v4.6] feat(CI): Use rspec-github formatter #6356

tvdeyen merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2025

Conversation

@solidus-bot
Copy link

@solidus-bot solidus-bot bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to v4.6:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@tvdeyen
feat(CI): Use rspec-github formatter
14b3b33 
This adds GitHub Actions annotations for our test runs,
which makes it much easier to find failed specs.

Refs: https://github.com/Drieam/rspec-github
(cherry picked from commit b259540)
@solidus-bot solidus-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2025 00:20
@solidus-bot solidus-bot bot mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2025
Merged
5 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added changelog:solidus_api Changes to the solidus_api gem changelog:solidus_backend Changes to the solidus_backend gem changelog:solidus_core Changes to the solidus_core gem changelog:solidus_sample Changes to the solidus_sample gem changelog:solidus_admin changelog:solidus_legacy_promotions Changes to the solidus_legacy_promotions gem changelog:solidus_promotions Changes to the solidus_promotions gem labels Nov 1, 2025
@tvdeyen tvdeyen removed changelog:solidus_api Changes to the solidus_api gem changelog:solidus_backend Changes to the solidus_backend gem changelog:solidus_core Changes to the solidus_core gem changelog:solidus_sample Changes to the solidus_sample gem changelog:solidus_admin changelog:solidus_legacy_promotions Changes to the solidus_legacy_promotions gem changelog:solidus_promotions Changes to the solidus_promotions gem labels Nov 1, 2025
@tvdeyen tvdeyen removed this from Solidus Admin Nov 1, 2025
@tvdeyen tvdeyen added the changelog:skip Changes that we don't want to be listed in the Changelog label Nov 1, 2025
@tvdeyen tvdeyen enabled auto-merge November 1, 2025 00:23
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.35%. Comparing base (d724535) to head (14b3b33).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on v4.6.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v4.6    #6356   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.35%   89.35%           
=======================================
  Files         961      961           
  Lines       20195    20195           
=======================================
  Hits        18046    18046           
  Misses       2149     2149

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tvdeyen tvdeyen added changelog:repository Changes to the repository not within any gem and removed changelog:skip Changes that we don't want to be listed in the Changelog labels Nov 1, 2025
@tvdeyen tvdeyen merged commit 8173174 into v4.6 Nov 1, 2025
44 of 49 checks passed
@tvdeyen tvdeyen deleted the backport/v4.6/pr-6348 branch November 1, 2025 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tvdeyen tvdeyen tvdeyen approved these changes

Assignees

@tvdeyen tvdeyen

Labels

changelog:repository Changes to the repository not within any gem

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tvdeyen