Skip to content

Conversation

eseliger
Copy link
Member

See inline comments.

Test plan: Code review.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 30, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sourcegraph-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 30, 2025 1:51am

See inline comments.

Test plan: Code review.

<AWSOneClickLaunchForm />

If you're running into any problem, see our [Troubleshooting guide](/admin/troubleshooting).
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there was nothing AWS related.

| `KUBERNETES_IMAGE_PULL_SECRETS` | N/A | The names of Kubernetes image pull secrets to use for pulling images. e.g. my-secret,my-other-secret |

<Callout type="note">Note: `EXECUTOR_KUBERNETES_NAMESPACE` should be set to either "default" or the specific namespace where your Executor is deployed.</Callout>
<Callout type="note">`EXECUTOR_KUBERNETES_NAMESPACE` should be set to either "default" or the specific namespace where your Executor is deployed.</Callout>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the callout already has a note-y thing

9. Logs are streamed from the executor to a Sourcegraph API
10. The executor calls a Sourcegraph API to that "complete" the Job.

### Native execution
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not tested well, no one should need to use this and I know no one who does.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

surprisingly, no customers are on versions <3.0 😆

Comment on lines -8 to -15
- [Migrating from Sourcegraph 3.30.0, 3.30.1, and 3.30.2](/admin/migration/3_30)
- [Migrating to Sourcegraph 3.31.x](/admin/migration/3_31)
- [Migrating to Sourcegraph 5.1.x](/admin/migration/5_1)

## Legacy guides

- [Migrating from Sourcegraph 2.13 to 3.0.0](/admin/migration/3_0)
- [Migrating from Sourcegraph 3.x to 3.7.2+](/admin/migration/3_7)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all of these are very very old


Sourcegraph's code search index scales horizontally with the number of files being indexed for search. Multiple shards may be allocated for one repository, and the index is agnostic to whether the code exists in one massive repository or many smaller ones. Sourcegraph has been used to index both large monorepos and tens of thousands of smaller repositories.

### Known Limitations
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not a known limitation worth calling out


- Sourcegraph will inspect the full tree for language detection. It incrementally caches and builds the language statistics to reuse information across commits. However, this has been shown to create too much load in monorepos. You can disable this feature by setting the environment variable `USE_ENHANCED_LANGUAGE_DETECTION=false` on `sourcegraph-frontend`.

## Custom git binaries
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not something we want to encourage

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
# Sourcegraph Nginx HTTP and HTTPS/SSL configuration

This documentation page has been moved to "[Sourcegraph HTTP and HTTPS/SSL configuration](/admin/http_https_configuration)".
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

replaced by redirect

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some parts moved over to the faq thing, most don't seem like anyone would use them

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

regenerated using script

@eseliger eseliger requested a review from unknwon July 30, 2025 01:49
@eseliger
Copy link
Member Author

joe please stamp

@eseliger eseliger marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2025 01:50
@eseliger eseliger merged commit b98d50a into main Jul 30, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@eseliger eseliger deleted the es/chore-1 branch July 30, 2025 01:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants