Skip to content

Conversation

jdpleiness
Copy link
Contributor

@jdpleiness jdpleiness commented Sep 5, 2024

Add some rewording to the main deployment landing page.

Pull Request approval

Although pull request approval is not enforced for this repository in order to reduce friction, merging without a review will generate a ticket for the docs team to review your changes. So if possible, have your pull request approved before merging.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sourcegraph-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 6, 2024 9:06pm

Copy link
Contributor Author

jdpleiness commented Sep 5, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @jdpleiness and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@jdpleiness jdpleiness marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2024 21:53
@jdpleiness jdpleiness requested review from a team, Chickensoupwithrice and MaedahBatool and removed request for a team September 5, 2024 21:54
- Header on Admin page didnt' make sense
- Removed stuff that shouldn't be presented to the user at this level of the docs
@jdpleiness jdpleiness force-pushed the 09-05-clean_up_entrypoint_for_deploy_and_upgrade branch from c2c09cb to 2b46756 Compare September 6, 2024 21:02
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdpleiness commented Sep 6, 2024

Merge activity

  • Sep 6, 5:02 PM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
  • Sep 6, 5:03 PM EDT: @jdpleiness merged this pull request with Graphite.

@jdpleiness jdpleiness merged commit 48f25e0 into main Sep 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@jdpleiness jdpleiness deleted the 09-05-clean_up_entrypoint_for_deploy_and_upgrade branch September 6, 2024 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants