-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
fixing number-maths issue & some tests #155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
yashvikram30
wants to merge
2
commits into
souvikinator:v4.0.0-alpha
Choose a base branch
from
yashvikram30:fix/test-runner
base: v4.0.0-alpha
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add defensive programming for robustness.
Consider adding null checks and error handling to prevent runtime errors when siblings is undefined or when block.id is not found.
function groupListItems(block, siblings, type) { + if (!siblings || !Array.isArray(siblings)) { + return [block]; + } + // Find all consecutive list items of the same type at the same parent const startIdx = siblings.findIndex((b) => b.id === block.id); + if (startIdx === -1) { + return [block]; + } + const group = []; for ( let i = startIdx; i < siblings.length && siblings[i].type === type && siblings[i].parent?.id === block.parent?.id; i++ ) { group.push(siblings[i]); } return group; }📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the groupListItems function handles edge cases correctly.
The grouping logic looks sound, but please ensure it handles edge cases properly, particularly when siblings array might be undefined or when block IDs are not found.
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 175
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 4202
Handle undefined siblings and missing block IDs in groupListItems
The current implementation will throw if
siblingsisundefinedor ifblock.idisn’t found (startIdx === -1). Add guards at the top ofgroupListItemsto return an empty array in those cases.Locations to update:
src/plugins/renderer/mdx/transformers/blocks.tslines 763–777Suggested diff:
function groupListItems(block, siblings, type) { - // Find all consecutive list items of the same type at the same parent - const startIdx = siblings.findIndex((b) => b.id === block.id); + // Bail out if siblings is not an array or block id isn’t in siblings + if (!Array.isArray(siblings)) return []; + const startIdx = siblings.findIndex((b) => b.id === block.id); + if (startIdx < 0) return []; const group = []; for ( let i = startIdx; i < siblings.length && siblings[i].type === type && siblings[i].parent?.id === block.parent?.id; i++ ) { group.push(siblings[i]); } return group; }This ensures we never call
.findIndexor index intosiblingswhen it’s unset or whenblock.idisn’t present.📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents