-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
change rich_text to text for code. #157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Doradx
wants to merge
1
commit into
souvikinator:master
Choose a base branch
from
Doradx:patch-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify that
block.code.textis the correct property according to the Notion API.The change from
block.code.rich_texttoblock.code.textlooks syntactically correct and maintains the same extraction logic. However, please confirm that thetextproperty exists on code blocks and has the expected structure withplain_textfields.🌐 Web query:
💡 Result:
According to the latest Notion API documentation, to extract the text content from a Notion code block, you should reference the rich_text array within the block’s type-specific object, and then access the plain_text property of the rich text elements.
For a code block object, the structure is:
{ "object": "block", "type": "code", "code": { "caption": [ ... ], "rich_text": [ { "type": "text", "plain_text": "your code here", ... } ], "language": "python" } }code.rich_text[].plain_text
You need to iterate through the rich_text array inside the code object and concatenate the plain_text fields to obtain the full text content of the code block[10].
This approach is consistent for extracting plain text from other rich-text-based block types (e.g., paragraphs, headings) as well[3][10].
Summary:
Citations:
Use
code.rich_textinstead ofcode.textfor Notion code blocksThe Notion API places code content in
block.code.rich_text, notblock.code.text. Please revert the property change to match the official spec.• Location to fix:
• Updated snippet:
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents