Skip to content

Conversation

@asteurer
Copy link
Contributor

@asteurer asteurer commented Sep 8, 2025

Please let me know if I forgot anything!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The latest file needs to be named just verman.json

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file needs to be renamed to vermain0.1.1.json and contain the the v0.1.1 manifest. The latest version is always picked from just the package_name.json

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lol no idea where I was getting 0.1.2. Thanks for catching that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, wait. The latest GH release for verman is 0.1.2. Do I need to include both 0.1.1 and 0.1.2? If I'm remembering correctly, there were issues with the 0.1.1 release.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC, it was 0.1.0 that had issues. But in any case, let us preserve history, as the registry already has 0.1.1 and 0.1.0 published. We should end up with a structure like

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not quire sure why 0.1.0 has changed? It should just be rename verman.json to [email protected] and then add the 0.1.2 manifest. Older versions shouldn't have to do anything.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change is just removing whitespace. Will that cause problems?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess not. I dislike cluttering git history this way but in this case I should get over myself eh

Copy link
Contributor

@itowlson itowlson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine apart from the changes to the 0.1.0 file. Could you revert those please? Happy to approve and merge at that point.

@itowlson itowlson merged commit 9c5c83f into spinframework:main Oct 23, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants