Skip to content

Conversation

dicej
Copy link
Collaborator

@dicej dicej commented Aug 25, 2025

This includes (minimal, raw binding) support for spin:[email protected] and spin:[email protected].

This includes (minimal, raw binding) support for `spin:[email protected]` and
`spin:[email protected]`.

Signed-off-by: Joel Dice <[email protected]>


class SpinAll(Protocol):
class SpinSdkWit(Protocol):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why this changed. I assume it is due to an upstream change?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it's due to bytecodealliance/componentize-py#150, which changed how the --world-module option works. I don't think it matters in this case since the world had no direct function imports or exports (i.e. all the functions are inside interfaces), so the class is empty and useless. Renaming it shouldn't break any real-world code.

@dicej dicej merged commit ffc517a into spinframework:main Aug 26, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants