Skip to content

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Feb 7, 2025

No description provided.

@spencergibb
Copy link
Member

Your change implies other types can't be refreshed. Can you describe why you want this change?

@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Feb 7, 2025

Your change implies other types can't be refreshed. Can you describe why you want this change?

My point is not only Java Records but any type using constructor binding.

See https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/1e73a7cf8b376ea4b5ead9e56df093e5354c4de7/spring-boot-project/spring-boot/src/main/java/org/springframework/boot/context/properties/bind/BindMethod.java#L33C18-L33C43

@spencergibb
Copy link
Member

Then say that rather than value object.

Copy link
Member

@spencergibb spencergibb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change value object to something about constructor binding.

@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Feb 8, 2025

I copied terms from Javadoc of Spring Boot, WDYT?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants