Skip to content

Conversation

@alxkm
Copy link
Contributor

@alxkm alxkm commented Sep 17, 2025

This PR significantly enhances the test coverage for Google GenAI components by adding comprehensive edge case and boundary condition testing across multiple test classes.

Changes

CreateGeminiRequestTests Enhancements

  • Thinking Budget Edge Cases: Added tests for null and zero thinking budget values to ensure proper config handling
  • Message Boundary Conditions: Added tests for empty message lists and system-message-only scenarios
  • Configuration Testing: Added label configuration testing to verify proper metadata handling
  • Validation: Ensures proper thinkingConfig presence/absence based on budget values

GoogleGenAiChatOptions Test Improvements

  • Zero Value Handling: Added test for zero thinking budget to verify edge case behavior
  • Empty Collections: Added test for empty label maps to ensure proper handling of minimal configurations
  • Boundary Validation: Ensures options handle edge cases gracefully without exceptions

JsonSchemaConverter Edge Case Coverage

  • Empty Input Handling: Added tests for empty JSON objects and empty strings
  • Null Safety: Added null input validation to ensure proper exception handling
  • Error Scenarios: Validates that appropriate RuntimeExceptions are thrown for invalid inputs

Benefits

  • Improved Robustness
  • Better Reliability
  • Maintenance Benefits
  • Regression Prevention

Testing Coverage

The added tests cover:

  • Null value handling across all major configuration options
  • Empty collection management for lists and maps
  • Invalid input scenarios with appropriate exception validation
  • Minimal configuration testing to ensure components work with bare-minimum setups
  • Boundary condition validation for numeric and string parameters

…ponents

Co-authored-by: Oleksandr Klymenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Klymenko <[email protected]>
@ilayaperumalg
Copy link
Member

@alxkm Thanks for the PR improving the test coverage. Rebased and merged as 63ba02a

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants