Skip to content

Conversation

izeye
Copy link
Contributor

@izeye izeye commented Jan 19, 2025

This PR polishes a bit.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jan 19, 2025
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 20, 2025
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.5.x milestone Jan 20, 2025
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ You can also add javadoc:org.springframework.test.context.DynamicPropertySource[

When using devtools, you can annotate beans and bean methods with javadoc:org.springframework.boot.devtools.restart.RestartScope[format=annotation].
Such beans won't be recreated when the devtools restart the application.
This is especially useful for Testcontainer javadoc:org.testcontainers.containers.Container[] beans, as they keep their state despite the application restart.
This is especially useful for Testcontainers javadoc:org.testcontainers.containers.Container[] beans, as they keep their state despite the application restart.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was intentionally singular. If it's to change, I think it should be changed to "container".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wilkinsona How about "Testcontainers'" or just removing "Testcontainer"?

"container Container beans" doesn't sound right to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops. Yeah, I think we can just remove it as we're already in a section about Testcontainers. I think "for Container beans" reads better and there's enough context to know that it's a Testcontainers container.

@@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@
},
{
"name": "management.metrics.graphql.autotime.enabled",
"description": "Whether to automatically time web client requests.",
"description": "Whether to automatically time GraphQL requests.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've opened #43901 for this as I think it warrants a separate issue that'll appear in the changelog.

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ class FilteringStatusListener extends ContextAwareBase implements StatusListener

/**
* Creates a new {@link FilteringStatusListener}.
* @param delegate the {@link StatusListener} delegate to
* @param delegate the {@link StatusListener} to delegate
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be "to delegate to".

izeye added 2 commits January 21, 2025 23:46
Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
@izeye
Copy link
Contributor Author

izeye commented Jan 21, 2025

@wilkinsona Thanks for the feedback!

I applied your suggestions in cbb44e1.

@izeye
Copy link
Contributor Author

izeye commented Jan 23, 2025

Sorry, I forgot to revert the change on the description of the management.metrics.graphql.autotime.enabled property. I've done it in cadf0e0.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.5.x, 3.3.x Jan 24, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
This was referenced Jan 24, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.3.9 Jan 24, 2025
wilkinsona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
See gh-43879

Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Thanks very much, @izeye!

@izeye izeye deleted the polish-20250119 branch January 24, 2025 09:02
arefbehboudi pushed a commit to arefbehboudi/spring-boot that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
See spring-projectsgh-43879

Signed-off-by: Johnny Lim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: arefbehboudi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants