Skip to content

Conversation

shakuzen
Copy link
Member

A new interface OtlpMetricsSender was introduced to allow users to customize the sending of Protobuf OTLP metrics using the OtlpMeterRegistry. This configures it, if available as a bean, on the auto-configured OtlpMeterRegistry.

See the corresponding Micrometer documentation and micrometer-metrics/micrometer#6025

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Apr 15, 2025
A new interface OtlpMetricsSender was introduced to allow users to customize the sending of OTLP metrics using the OtlpMeterRegistry. This configures it, if available as a bean, on the auto-configured OtlpMeterRegistry.
@shakuzen shakuzen force-pushed the otlp-metrics-sender branch from 764428c to 82d7bd3 Compare April 15, 2025 09:58
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Apr 15, 2025
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.5.x milestone Apr 15, 2025
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Auto-configure OtlpMetricsSender if available Auto-configure OtlpMetricsSender if available Apr 15, 2025
@philwebb philwebb self-assigned this Apr 15, 2025
philwebb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
Update `OtlpMetricsExportAutoConfiguration` to use the new
`OtlpMetricsSender`interface that allows users to customize the
sending of OTLP metrics using the `OtlpMeterRegistry`.

See gh-45204
philwebb added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
Update `OtlpMetricsExportAutoConfiguration` to use the new
`OtlpMetricsSender`interface that allows users to customize the
sending of OTLP metrics using the `OtlpMeterRegistry`.

See gh-45204
@philwebb philwebb closed this in 97c44d1 Apr 15, 2025
@philwebb philwebb modified the milestones: 3.5.x, 3.5.0-RC1 Apr 15, 2025
@philwebb
Copy link
Member

Thanks @shakuzen!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: enhancement A general enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants