Skip to content

Conversation

razvan
Copy link
Member

@razvan razvan commented Nov 28, 2024

Description

Part of: stackabletech/issues#586

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes
# Author
- [ ] Changes are OpenShift compatible
- [ ] CRD changes approved
- [ ] CRD documentation for all fields, following the [style guide](https://docs.stackable.tech/home/nightly/contributor/docs/style-guide).
- [ ] Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
- [ ] Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
- [ ] Changes need to be "offline" compatible
# Reviewer
- [ ] Code contains useful comments
- [ ] Code contains useful logging statements
- [ ] (Integration-)Test cases added
- [ ] Documentation added or updated. Follows the [style guide](https://docs.stackable.tech/home/nightly/contributor/docs/style-guide).
- [ ] Changelog updated
- [ ] Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)
# Acceptance
- [ ] Feature Tracker has been updated
- [ ] Proper release label has been added
- [ ] [Roadmap](https://github.com/orgs/stackabletech/projects/25/views/1) has been updated

Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was a bit more picky here, as it's probably the template PR for other operators and I don't want you to have problems mid-way

razvan and others added 3 commits November 29, 2024 09:26
@razvan razvan requested a review from sbernauer November 29, 2024 08:53
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finally got the time to review it properly, sorry! Only one code comment left.

Can we please rename the PRs to something a bit more user-facing? E.g. feat: Support setting TLS certificate lifetimes or feat: Support setting TLS certificate lifetimes to avoid frequent Pod restarts

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bernauer <[email protected]>
@razvan razvan changed the title feat: requestedSecretLifetime role group property added feat: Support setting TLS certificate lifetimes Nov 29, 2024
@razvan razvan self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
sbernauer
sbernauer previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM (one nit). Please wait with merging until the decision stackabletech/issues#673 is approved

sbernauer
sbernauer previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!
Code LGTM. Please wait with merging until the decision stackabletech/issues#673 is approved

sbernauer
sbernauer previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member

It would be awesome if you could run cargo update to get the CI green ;)

@razvan
Copy link
Member Author

razvan commented Dec 4, 2024

It would be awesome if you could run cargo update to get the CI green ;)

done

@razvan razvan requested a review from sbernauer December 4, 2024 08:24
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wuhuuuu!

@razvan razvan enabled auto-merge December 4, 2024 08:27
@razvan razvan added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit dcd94b0 Dec 4, 2024
17 checks passed
@razvan razvan deleted the feat/issue-586 branch December 4, 2024 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants